@article {Lema2019731, title = {Inter- and Intra-Specific Transcriptional and Phenotypic Responses of Pseudo-nitzschia under Different Nutrient Conditions}, journal = {Genome Biology and Evolution}, volume = {11}, number = {3}, year = {2019}, note = {cited By 1}, pages = {731-747}, publisher = {Oxford University Press}, abstract = {Untangling thefunctionalbasis of divergencebetweenclosely relatedspecies is a steptowardunderstanding speciesdynamicswithin communities at both the evolutionary and ecological scales. We investigated cellular (i.e., growth, domoic acid production, and nutrient consumption) and molecular (transcriptomic analyses) responses to varying nutrient concentrations across several strains belonging to three species of the toxic diatomgenus Pseudo-nitzschia. Threemain resultswere obtained. First, strains fromthe same species displayed similar transcriptomic, but not necessarily cellular, responses to the experimental conditions. It showed the importance of considering intraspecific diversity to investigate functional divergence between species. Second, a major exception to the first findingwas a strain recently isolated fromthe natural environment and displaying contrasting gene expression patterns related to cell motility and domoic acid production. This result illustrated the profound modifications thatmay occurwhen transferring a cell fromthe natural to the in vitro environment and asks for future studies to better understand the influence of culture duration and life cycleon expression patterns. Third, transcriptomic responsesweremore similarbetween the two speciesdisplaying similar ecology in situ, irrespective of the genetic distance. This was especially true formolecular responses related to TCA cycle, photosynthesis, and nitrogen metabolism. However, transcripts related to phosphate uptake were variable between species. It highlighted the importance of considering both overall genetic distance and ecological divergence to explain functional divergence between species. {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.}, keywords = {analogs and derivatives, Biological Evolution, comparative study, Diatom, Diatoms, Domoic acid, evolution, kainic acid, Metabolism, Multigene Family, Nutrients, Phenotype, Physiology}, issn = {17596653}, doi = {10.1093/gbe/evz030}, url = {https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/11/3/731/5332980}, author = {Lema, Kimberley A. and Metegnier, G. and Qu{\'e}r{\'e}, J. and Latimier, Marie and Agn{\`e}s Youenou and Lambert, Christophe and Juliette Fauchot and Le Gac, Mickael and Costantini, M.} } @article {3631, title = {Looking for the bird Kiss: evolutionary scenario in sauropsids.}, journal = {BMC Evol Biol}, volume = {14}, year = {2014}, month = {2014}, pages = {30}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The neuropeptide Kiss and its receptor KissR are key-actors in the brain control of reproduction in mammals, where they are responsible for the stimulation of the activity of GnRH neurones. Investigation in other vertebrates revealed up to 3 Kiss and 4 KissR paralogs, originating from the two rounds of whole genome duplication in early vertebrates. In contrast, the absence of Kiss and KissR has been suggested in birds, as no homologs of these genes could be found in current genomic databases. This study aims at addressing the question of the existence, from an evolutionary perspective, of the Kisspeptin system in birds. It provides the first large-scale investigation of the Kisspeptin system in the sauropsid lineage, including ophidian, chelonian, crocodilian, and avian lineages.

RESULTS: Sauropsid Kiss and KissR genes were predicted from multiple genome and transcriptome databases by TBLASTN. Phylogenetic and syntenic analyses were performed to classify predicted sauropsid Kiss and KissR genes and to re-construct the evolutionary scenarios of both gene families across the sauropsid radiation.Genome search, phylogenetic and synteny analyses, demonstrated the presence of two Kiss genes (Kiss1 and Kiss2 types) and of two KissR genes (KissR1 and KissR4 types) in the sauropsid lineage. These four genes, also present in the mammalian lineage, would have been inherited from their common amniote ancestor. In contrast, synteny analyses supported that the other Kiss and KissR paralogs are missing in sauropsids as in mammals, indicating their absence in the amniote lineage. Among sauropsids, in the avian lineage, we demonstrated the existence of a Kiss2-like gene in three bird genomes. The divergence of these avian Kiss2-like sequences from those of other vertebrates, as well as their absence in the genomes of some other birds, revealed the processes of Kiss2 gene degeneration and loss in the avian lineage.

CONCLUSION: These findings contribute to trace back the evolutionary history of the Kisspeptin system in amniotes and sauropsids, and provide the first molecular evidence of the existence and fate of a Kiss gene in birds.

}, keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Avian Proteins, Biological Evolution, Birds, Humans, Kisspeptins, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Reptiles, Sequence Alignment, Synteny}, issn = {1471-2148}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2148-14-30}, author = {Pasquier, J{\'e}r{\'e}my and Anne-Gaelle Lafont and Karine Rousseau and Qu{\'e}rat, Bruno and Chemineau, Philippe and Sylvie Dufour} }