Connexion utilisateur

Multiple kisspeptin receptors in early osteichthyans provide new insights into the evolution of this receptor family.

TitreMultiple kisspeptin receptors in early osteichthyans provide new insights into the evolution of this receptor family.
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2012
AuteursPasquier, J, Lafont, A-G, Jeng, S-R, Morini, M, Dirks, R, van den Thillart, G, Tomkiewicz, J, Tostivint, H, Chang, C-F, Rousseau, K, Dufour, S
JournalPLoS One
Volume7
Ticket11
Paginatione48931
Date Published2012
ISSN1932-6203
Mots-clésAnimals, Cloning, Molecular, Conserved Sequence, DNA, Complementary, Evolution, Molecular, Fishes, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Genome, Humans, Kisspeptins, Molecular Sequence Data, Multigene Family, Phylogeny, Receptors, Cell Surface, RNA, Messenger, Synteny
Résumé

Deorphanization of GPR54 receptor a decade ago led to the characterization of the kisspeptin receptor (Kissr) in mammals and the discovery of its major role in the brain control of reproduction. While a single gene encodes for Kissr in eutherian mammals including human, other vertebrates present a variable number of Kissr genes, from none in birds, one or two in teleosts, to three in an amphibian, xenopus. In order to get more insight into the evolution of Kissr gene family, we investigated the presence of Kissr in osteichthyans of key-phylogenetical positions: the coelacanth, a representative of early sarcopterygians, the spotted gar, a non-teleost actinopterygian, and the European eel, a member of an early group of teleosts (elopomorphs). We report the occurrence of three Kissr for the first time in a teleost, the eel. As measured by quantitative RT-PCR, the three eel Kissr were differentially expressed in the brain-pituitary-gonadal axis, and differentially regulated in experimentally matured eels, as compared to prepubertal controls. Subfunctionalisation, as shown by these differences in tissue distribution and regulation, may have represented significant evolutionary constraints for the conservation of multiple Kissr paralogs in this species. Furthermore, we identified four Kissr in both coelacanth and spotted gar genomes, providing the first evidence for the presence of four Kissr in vertebrates. Phylogenetic and syntenic analyses supported the existence of four Kissr paralogs in osteichthyans and allowed to propose a clarified nomenclature of Kissr (Kissr-1 to -4) based on these paralogs. Syntenic analysis suggested that the four Kissr paralogs arose through the two rounds of whole genome duplication (1R and 2R) in early vertebrates, followed by multiple gene loss events in the actinopterygian and sarcopterygian lineages. Due to gene loss there was no impact of the teleost-specific whole genome duplication (3R) on the number of Kissr paralogs in current teleosts.

DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0048931
Alternate JournalPLoS ONE
Identifiant (ID) PubMed23185286
PubMed Central IDPMC3502363